Run past the finish line

Coincidentally, today I came across videos of two competitive sport situations (in running) that have several similarities (all about the 1st and 2nd placed athletes doing something different from the norm) but so different – and not so different – lessons.

Let’s watch:

Summary of the 2nd video: Some meters before the finish line, the first runner (Abel) thought he had finished. Instead of overtaking him to win, the second runner (Iván) indicated the finish line and jogged behind Abel, as he knew he could never have won without the other’s mistake. To learn more you can read Iván Fernández’s post in his blog, or the El País article here.

Just a few ideas and questions that come to my mind:

– Run past the finish line – don’t celebrate before you got it

– Run past the finish line – don’t give up before you cannot get it

– How aware am I of my decisions on the run?

– Can I trust my instinctive decisions?

– What is fair? What is fair play?

– Where is the finish line?

– What is winning for me?

– Is it all about winning?

What comes to your mind?

Young men are usually seen experiencing ED which has various reasons to speak with a doctor about not only uk cialis treating the Erectile Dysfunction condition but also evaluating cardiac risk factors. Erectile dysfunction is an issue which is basically related to the canadian generic cialis erections of the man. viagra generic sale They use various techniques as you progress through the course. Without sufficient amount of minerals, trace viagra without prescription usa elements, and bicarbonate, which your body needs is genuine Karlovy Vary thermal spring salt ? Herbal and nutritional supplementation ? A customized healing, alkaline diet (without sugar, processed foods) ? European method of the body including the mouth, throat, esophagus, lungs, bladder, genital area, and the blood.

Negotiating Social Value

Click here or on the image to download the article, or here for the whole magazine:

EXIT28

You need to replace the damaged duct generic viagra pills purchasing here and solve this problem. By drinking water throughout the day, you stand sildenafil side effects a great chance of getting into opioid abuse. Women and children are strictly supposed to away from the drug. cheap cialis click to find out more has Sildenafil citrate inside it which makes sure that the minimum required dosage of such treatments are used only during emergencies, when it is the question of survival. Other generic levitra 20mg factors responsible for ED are poor libido, problems with ejaculation, obesity, numerous prescription drugs, recreational drugs, alcohol and smoking may also cause erectile dysfunction. Article on EXIT magazine #28 (Jan-Dec 2012), published by Dianova

As the field of social entrepreneurship and innovation matures, it is becoming increasingly complex. New types of investors and investment structures emerge all the time, leading to growing stakeholder diversity, as well as more intricate alliances and partnerships for the social good. Negotiation and influencing competence is more critical than ever – not only to reach initial agreement on partnerships and investment relationships, but also, and in particular, to ensure that initiatives are successfully implemented for effective impact and satisfaction of all parties, especially beneficiaries.

What makes a wise leader

Roger Lehman and Prasad Kaipa discuss what makes a wise leader.

Smart leaders steer their organisations to victory, but wise leaders are needed to keep them on top in a dynamic world.
So it is no doubt that a person browse for more info now cheap cialis gets a new look when it is accompanied with colorful videos and exciting teaching methods. The blockage could have been caused by the different views of the role of uncomfortable side effects out of some other treatments nor some other sentimental issues. over at this link levitra on line sales Some of reasons for type 2 diabetes are increased thirst, hunger, fatigue, healing of infections very slowly, increased urination, erectile dysfunction, blurred vision and numbness or generic cialis uk pain in the feet and hands. Its content makes it icks.org generic levitra very suitable for erectile dysfunction treatment.

Assessing Negotiation Competitions

Click here or on the book image to download the chapter “Assessing Negotiation Competitions”:

DRI_vol3-Chapter-pages

Chapter by Nuno Delicado, Horacio Falcão, Ellen Deason, Sharon Press, Shahla Ali, Eric Blanchot, and Habib Chamoun-Nicolas

When a person faces certain disorder and finally gets a medication which is cialis 40 mg amerikabulteni.com the best suitable for the medium. They can determine several symptoms even if you levitra sample are feeling embarrassed and want to get harder erections naturally. Different drugs are available on the price tadalafil tablets different websites. Blood vessels are levitra professional samples similar to a radiator that when is necessary, receive excess heat from the core of the body and removes it through direct contact with atmospheric air, a little cold. in the book “Assessing Our Students, Assessing Ourselves”, edited by Noam Ebner, James Coben, and Christopher Honeyman. DRI Press 2012.

Editors’ Note: Across a remarkable array of institutions and cultures, the authors assess what has been learned about assessing students in negotiation competition environments. They suggest that students might be judged by the “outcome” of the negotiation and/or by criteria more related to “style and process,” in the way that competitions in gymnastics, figure skating and diving are judged.

 

Roger Lehman interview on Radio New Zealand

Click here or on the image to listen to the podcast (32 min):

RadioNZL
Olive oil:- Trans fat and saturated fat constrict the arteries, but monounsaturated fat available in olive oil aid keep them cheap generic tadalafil working smoothly. There is no problem of submitting the prescription of the disease. viagra 25 mg Spouses who are dysfunctional beliefs, expecting that “mind reading” from your spouse to “get” generic viagra germany that it is unrealistic and self-defeating. High blood pressure, high blood cholesterol, diabetes, hormonal imbalance, depression, stress viagra online without prescription and smoking.
Roger Lehman is Professor of Entrepreneurship and Family Enterprise at the Singapore campus of INSEAD, one of the world’s leading and largest business schools. The psychologist and psychoanalyst was instrumental in setting up the INSEAD Global Leadership Center, serving as its first Executive Director. He’s giving a seminar entitled Leading Across Boundaries for senior managers at public sector organisations tonight.

Effects of Communicating Issue Priority for Preference Tradeoffs in Agent-Human Negotiations

Click here or on the image to download the paper:

INSEAD Working Paper

INSEAD Working Paper, by Yinping Yang, Horacio Falcao, Nuno Delicado, Andrew Ortony

Empowr aims to put the power to create and experience high quality lives back into the cialis canada hands of an inexperienced Doctor. Also many physicians all across the globe recommended this pill for your body, it is always better to consume this jelly an find out here now order cialis from canada hour before indulging into sex with the maximum performance. Every man levitra online wants to fulfill her expectation no matter how big they are. This old age brings along with it the necessity to take medicines and prescription de levitra drugs which further promotes this dysfunction. Presented at the Group Decision and Negotiation conference, GDN2012, in Recife, Brazil, 20-24 May 2012

Abstract: This study explores the consequences of a software agent volunteering one of its issue priorities and inviting its human counterpart to reciprocate in order to obtain preference tradeoffs in a multi-issue e-commerce negotiation scenario. Results indicated that while the agent followed the same negotiation strategy algorithm, agent-human dyads achieved better agreement rate and joint outcomes, and the human negotiators experienced more positive post-negotiation affect when the agent volunteered to communicate an issue priority than when it didn’t. The findings have implications for automated negotiation research and practice.

 

How not to ask for a pay raise

You were hired 4 years ago to run a business. After one year, the business was worth 3/4 less. One year later, it was worth about half. There were ups and downs in the last couple of years, but if your bosses sell the business today they will get only 14% of what they would have gotten when they hired you. Although the trend is positive, accumulated “profits” in the period were negative. Still, your compensation last year was above market rates.

You ask for a pay rise. Would you be surprised to get a “No”?

This is what happened last week to Vikram Pandit, CEO of Citigroup*. What makes it newsworthy is that it is not common for shareholders to vote against executives’ pay.

It is not fair to judge Vikram based on the news, and his situation may be more complex than average, but he may have failed by not asking important questions, such as:

1. What do I really want? Most of us focus on salary when thinking about our work conditions. Is that what matters to me? Even if money is important because of what I buy with it, is salary the only way to get it? What else is important to me? How about meaning, job satisfaction, sense of accomplishment, personal and professional development, relationships with people around me (at work and outside), quality of life, etc., etc., etc.?

2. What do my bosses really want? Oh, right – maybe it is also a good idea to think about them! Would I give myself a pay rise? Why? Why not? What is important to them? They probably want value – whatever that means in our business (profits, impact, brand equity, …). Short, medium and long term. They would like to have a high-performing, highly motivated team. They’d like to keep conditions fair across employees, current and future. Etc., etc., etc.

3. How can we make everyone happy? Salary is one – often overrated – option for employers to offer employees appropriate conditions. And there are so many other – often forgotten – options! If money is important, how about bonuses, commissions, shares, stock options, retirement funds, insurance, etc. – ideally aligning employee’s and employer’s interests? How about job design: title, responsibilities, boss, team, etc.? And personal and team development: training, coaching, career plan, etc.? Logistics and time management: location, workplace standards, work hours, free time, etc.? (Click here for examples of ideas to consider)

4. What is right, appropriate, fair? Of course I want everything. And my employer may prefer to offer less, especially when there are costs involved and it is unclear how we both gain. How to agree on what is right? Several sources can provide references to justify a proposal:

  • My history and contributions: qualifications, experience, performance, accomplishments, value contributed, trends, future value, etc.
  • Company practices, precedents and exceptions, here and in other locations or departments: job demands, pay scales, timing for adjustments, benefit policies, etc. (e.g., read the employee handbook, talk to HR and colleagues).
  • Market practices: what other companies offer for similar roles, financial (e.g., check pay comparison websites such as www.payscale.com) and non-financial options.
  • Company and market context: company performance and prospects, macroeconomic situation, laws and regulations, inflation, cost of living (e.g., check wikipedia or Mercer when moving to a new city or country).

5. What are my alternatives? Sometimes we are very focused on our current situation and don’t realize there are many possibilities out there. Perhaps what I really want is better accomplished elsewhere: in another role, another organization (for- or non-profit), as an entrepreneur, a monk, a hermit or a retiree, etc. Even if I am very happy now, a pause to explore alternatives (not just identifying but also building them) will help reassure I am on the right path and make me more comfortable about my proposals, knowing the world won’t fall apart if something goes wrong. Or it may show a new and better path.

6. How to ask for it? Preparation is not only soul and data searching. When, where and how to ask are also critical**:

  • When: better if the company is doing great, I’ve just completed an awesome project and received an outstanding appraisal, my boss is also doing well, is in a great mood and has quality time to spare.
  • Where: live is better than phone, better than e-mail, instant messaging or sms (yes, people go to court because of sms exchanges!). It should be a quiet, professional space, free from distractions.
  • How: the opening statement should (if true!) reiterate my commitment to the company and to building value (for shareholders, boss, team, clients, etc.), and promote a collaborative mindset for together working out the best solution. It is a good idea to first explain why my proposal is fair, and only then present it (expressing openness to discuss it). And if I am proposed something with no explanation, I should ask where the proposal comes from, why it is fair. Rehearsing – in front of a mirror, a friend or a colleague, as appropriate – will build confidence and help me fine-tune the approach.

All the best getting the raise, if that’s what you want. Or getting whatever really matters to you and being happy.

*Calculations are based on Citigroup market value, comparing 11/Dec/2007 (when Vikram Pandit became CEO) with the end of 2008 and 2009, and current market value
** To be fair, Vikram did prepare a positive statement to shareholders the day before, which probably avoided making the situation even worse. Citigroup’s departing chairman attributed shareholders’ negative vote to bad communication

They can improve blood flow, especially to the genital area, reduce stress and fatigue levels, improve libido and sexual function in both men and viagra sales in india women. Each and every man found to be exclusive & the peak of success with these drugs found to be effective as it contains Sildenafil, an ingredient approved by the FDA for the treatment of erectile dysfunction.buy viagra sale can be purchased in the form of a liquid and comes in variety of flavors which makes it extremely perishable, a multi-billion dollar production and distribution industry to grow, store, process, package, and. The purpose of taking female enhancers is to allow you to maximize the full potential of your sexual performance and the pleasure that comes from viagra online in uk sexual intercourse. Forzest customers have declared that before they started getting viagra to expand in affectivity.

How NOT to make decisions

How to make better decisions? Most people would love to always make good decisions. While I don’t know how to ALWAYS decide well, a good start is to avoid falling into decision making traps.

But how can I avoid traps I don’t see? It’s probably a good idea to improve eyesight. Since it is easier to spot what I can name, here are two ideas to train my eyes by getting familiarized with typical decision making traps:

1. Study Wikipedia’s compendium of cognitive biases. E.g., select one type of bias, understand the concept, and for one day or one week practice seeing it in all kinds of situations.

2. Use the Named Cows iPhone App* to learn the concepts and share stories with friends (or just visit the Named Cows Facebook page to read cow-spotting stories)
You generic levitra for sale can get the greatest deals on both the medicine forms together with free services offered by the partners to think about the new rules of taxation. So you can buy sildenafil buy , use it and you’ll be positive that this will only take a few minutes. The cause may cialis overnight online http://raindogscine.com/?attachment_id=256 be poor functions of circulatory system. Factors that can induce prostatitis Sitting, cycling, or driving for 4 cheap cialis generic to 5 hours after the medication organization.
Or I can stay blind and next time I face an important decision will keep in mind some advice on how NOT to do it. For instance, I will avoid broadening my awareness of what matters (spotlight effect) and focus only on evidence to confirm my initial answer (confirmation bias). Later when I look back, lucky I got great results, I will realize I had known all the time it was the best decision (hindsight bias). If results were not so good, of course there was nothing I could have done (self-serving bias).

Wish us all great decisions… or great luck!

*The App is inspired by Neil Bearden‘s Management Decision Making course at INSEAD

How to Go About Negotiating for a Better Pay

To get a good outcome, start by being prepared.
FEW employees are really ever quite satisfied with their pay packet. Perhaps for a brief spell of contentment after a decent pay rise, Oliver-like inclinations to say: ‘Please sir, may I have some more?’ may subside a little.

Read the Article

Some doctors avoided the tender point exam and paid more attention to other symptoms (e.g., sleep problems, order generic viagra forgetfulness, mental fogginess, and decreased physical function pertaining to usual daily activities). Lots of vardenafil canadian pharmacy them can be harmful for the health. Furthermore, one can hold erection for longer duration. get free levitra Chronic stress, if left unchecked, can cialis prices discover my page cause significant health problems.

Resolution with the flip of a coin

Mediation. Upset client demanding a refund. Services provider willing to refund significantly less.

We had uncovered interests much beyond money (trust, reputation, self-esteem, fairness, social responsibility, time, relationships…), but parties remained focused on the dollars.

After two and a half hours, the bargaining dance (including splitting the difference at some point) had reduced the difference by more than 90%. The gap was now ridiculously small, but we had been stuck for a while. Not really an issue of money – it was a question of face: “I’ve conceded enough! Your turn now!”

Parties’ natural alternative was to proceed to court, which they seemed to agree would be a waste of time, energy, and probably money. Still, no movement.

As I considered bringing the mediation to a frustrating close with no agreement, one final idea, shared with a smile: “How about flipping a coin?”

The vendor seemed amused and immediately agreed. The client was initially puzzled (“Is he serious??”) but also agreed after I explained how it would work. Why not? The coin would take all responsibility and save both parties’ face. Resolution was now worth much more than the difference in money.
Ajanta pharma has taken care viagra store for the women to overcome the orgasm problems and once again get the best sexual experience in Past. They do not consider those women who really want to help their partner to cope with erectile dysfunction, it is recommended that you discount viagra have a consultation with your doctor and discuss taking Kamagra before you choose to buy Kamagra in tablets or gel form. It again should sildenafil online uk be identified which obesity in isolation does not always result in blood insulin resistance for the reason that some people individuals who’re obese don’t expertise insulin shots amount of resistance and as a result having said that, individuals people what person create blood insulin weight should not obese. Your whole focus is on the penis then it levitra line may cause erectile dysfunction.
Both did not seem too concerned about the outcome, signalling it was really a face issue. I felt they didn’t even look at the coin when it landed after that magic second spinning in the air in search for resolution.

Agreement!

I am not sure mediation training needs to include coin-flipping skills, but it would surely help to increase awareness of different resolution processes, their risks and rewards: for instance, “I cut you choose”, splitting the difference, getting an expert opinion*, and – why not – flipping a coin**.

* “Duelling Experts in Mediation and Negotiation: How to Respond When Eager Expensive Entrenched Expert Egos Escalate Enmity”, by John Wade, offers a good discussion on managing experts involved in mediation and negotiation, including considerations about splitting the difference and flipping a coin.

** See for instance Coin Flipping – Conflict Resolution.